TW: Brief Thoughts on Anatomical Metaphors

When the spouse and I talk first thing in the morning without caffeine, I think our conversations are a bit more off-kilter, somewhat entertaining, and a bit more unfiltered than normal since our brains are not working at full capacity without the sweet, sweet nectar of God (otherwise known as coffee). This morning, we ended up talking about anatomical metaphors that describe a person’s actions or characteristics. I brought up an example from a few months ago with a colleague:

Colleague: You have some cojones. 

Me: No, I don’t. 

Colleague: Yes, that took some cojones. 

Me: I literally do not have cojones. Why can’t a different word be used? 

Colleague: ... 

I myself have bought into this culture of language as well, telling a friend that he had major balls when facing a difficult situation. Which, anatomically speaking, he has them. And my friend is a brave individual. But why does this part of male anatomy parallel with courage and bravery? Why have I bought into this narrative?

In the morning conversation with my spouse, we were wondering about other anatomical words that would relate to courage and bravery. The only other one I could think of was that someone had heart. I don’t know if the coffee still hasn’t kicked in or that with recent personal and world events my mind is still operating in an interesting fog... but as of late, I’ve been struggling with a loss of words (which is awful for someone who likes to write). And I’m struggling to find another part of the human anatomy that communicates bravery.

Like... damn, you went all cochlea-out.

Or... that was all about the humerus.

It's all about the humerus.
Or in this case, the humeri.

When the coffee started to kick in, the conversation between my spouse and I became increasingly serious. I’m prone to asking out loud very obvious questions to which I already know the answer, but part of me has to ask the question out loud so it’s a part of the spoken conversation:

“Why do people use balls to talk about brashness and bravery?” 

To which I answered my own question out loud to my spouse and myself:

“Because patriarchy rules and has the power and that power isn’t for all. 
Because male genitalia is a part of anatomy that you can force upon and into another person. 
Because we live in a rape culture where it’s okay to treat people as less than and as mere objects. 
Because we live in a world where the words ‘power’ and ‘brave’ don’t mean what they should. 
Because sin is damn insidious.” 

I think about how rape culture communicates the most horrific of power dynamics, and that patriarchal language buys into this oppressive system. Maybe those with a penis, getting to whip out their genitals is what I would call brash, yes, but this is not what I consider to be brave. This is not what I consider to be courageous. But yet a dominant narrative, a dominant culture tells us otherwise. That if you have the powerful anatomy, you're awesome, and if you don't, then too bad.
Very either/ or.
Very ends of the spectrum and no life in between.
A dominant narrative tells us all sorts of awful things, that if you do not conform or buy into this dominant narrative, your body and your life do not matter.

As someone who loves how words are used and someone who believes that the Word made flesh came to dwell among us in the person of Christ, I also realize that there are consequences to the words we use (and do not use). I am also at fault for words used and words omitted; I continue to struggle and to learn and re-learn. I realize that words have power, and sometimes that power is oppressive and does not liberate. Words can give power to a segment of the population and victimize other parts of humanity, and there are times where we don’t even realize how entrenched we are.

Crucifixion and Synod Assembly (it's not what you think...)

This may look like any non-descript Synod Assembly.

People from all over the synod gathered around round tables ready to discuss and act on the business of the church.

For me, this was far from a non-descript Synod Assembly. This gathering of people represented the Body of the risen Christ when I desperately needed to hear the words of resurrection hope and promise.

What led to this revelation? On June 2nd, I was on my way to Reno, NV with one of my pastoral colleagues (who also happens to be one of my good friends from seminary). We decided to drive from the Bay Area to Reno to have the freedom of mobility in case we wanted to explore Reno in our free time (and honestly, to have a car to have absolute control to leave Reno as soon as we were able... no offense to Reno, we just really like being at our homes). We also had to depart a day early from the Bay Area since we were both attending the Synod Council meeting that preceded Assembly.

We were joking in the car that we had a bag of grapes, a pack of Mentos, and a bottle of water between us, and that hopefully we wouldn’t be stuck in the infamous Donner Pass and have to resort to the cannibalism of days past. We were listening to satellite radio and I was singing my heart out to many a 1980s hair ballad. The trip was off to an uneventful start, but that changed in the high Sierras. It was in that infamous Donner Pass that I received the phone call that I had been dreading; my spouse, who was keeping vigil at his father’s deathbed, called to let me know that the hour had finally come. His dad slipped from this side of the eschaton to the other.

My spouse is a calm and collected man, and at the same time, quite loving and caring. He is also very close to his parents and his older sister. When I heard his voice on the phone, it was a voice from him I never heard; if there was ever a time that I could audibly describe what ashes and sackcloth sounded like, it was deeply entrenched in my spouse’s sobs and lamentations that day.

Because we were in Donner Pass, I lost reception on my cell phone. I looked at my friend driving the car, and about a million thoughts filled my mind to the brim. I was overwhelmed. I didn’t know how to feel; honestly, I was emotionally and psychologically preparing myself for the anniversary of my own father’s death which was going to happen the next day, the first day of Assembly. I wasn’t prepared to hear of my father-in-law’s death. Even though I had left St. Louis days before saying what was my final farewell to my father-in-law, I had tricked myself. I had somehow entered into the land of denial. I had convinced myself that there should have been more time.

I burst into tears and started yelling obscenities, especially the one that starts with the letter “f” and ends with the letter “k”. I yelled that word repeatedly as my friend drove down the Sierras and closer to Reno. I then started to laugh and cry simultaneously, convinced that I was going insane and that the circumstances of the timing of deaths in my life as of late have been eerily tied to regional and national church functions. My father went into a coma when I was in Sacramento at Synod Assembly the previous year; I left Assembly early to fly cross-country and made it to his deathbed in time. While working at the National Youth Gathering in Detroit a month and a half after my father’s death, my spouse’s aunt died. Upon my return from the Youth Gathering, my spouse and I were on a plane days later to attend the funeral in Illinois. And now this year’s Synod Assembly was marked with the death of my father-in-law.

I texted the Assistant to my bishop since cell phone reception was still spotty. When my friend and I arrived in Reno, I was half out of my mind and in a daze. I somehow functioned enough to get everything out of my car and check into the hotel. I was met at the hotel’s reception desk by my synodical bishop, who heard the news of my father-in-law’s death from the Assistant to the Bishop. They were both aware that the anniversary of my own father’s death would be the next day. He asked if there was anything he or the synod could help with; I told him that I had no idea, that I knew I needed to leave for St. Louis but I just didn’t know when. I somehow sat through the Synod Council meeting later that afternoon; honestly, I was still in denial. I thought I could lead a totally normal existence for an afternoon in a Council meeting, but as the afternoon crossed into evening, I knew where my heart was and where I physically needed to be. I booked my flight to leave Reno Friday afternoon with hopes of reaching St. Louis in the unholy early morning hours of Saturday.

There were many things I was supposed to do at this Synod Assembly. I was supposed to introduce a video made at the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women to the greater assembly. I was supposed to present a workshop about intersectionality through the lens of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women. I was supposed to toast my dad and smoke a cigar with a company of good friends. I was supposed to vote on synod business. I wanted to encourage discussions on #decolonizeLutheranism.

Schedules were rearranged and I was given the opportunity to give my report to the greater assembly on the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women. As I approached the dais to give my report, one of the assembly chaplains (a pastor I respect and enjoyed working with in my previous call) was called up as well. After I gave my report, after the video was shown, the bishop told the assembly that I stayed to give the report but was headed to the airport to be with my spouse and his family to grieve together. The assembly sent me off in prayer, the prayer that I experience resurrection hope in the midst of grieving. Prayers for traveling mercies. Prayers for peace and love. To be sent off with the assembly’s prayers was both humbling and powerful.

To profess the resurrection of Christ crucified... this is the business of the church, and I experienced that fully during my short time at Synod Assembly.

#decolonizelutheranism and Gender Identity: a guest post by Iren Raye

*A guest post by Iren Raye, #decolonizeLutheranism*

 

Hi friends, I’d like to tell you about myself. My name is Iren Raye, and I go by “Raye.” But this wasn’t always my name – I completely changed it last year. I was named Holly Nicole Wilson at birth, and assigned the gender “girl.”  I identify now as transgender, genderqueer, non-binary, non-conforming, agender. There’s not just one word that describes it for me. I don’t fit the gender I was assigned at birth, that I was raised as. I don’t fit the gender binary at all. I never have. And believe me, I have tried.

This story is not just about me. I am telling this story about me in order to tell a story about the church. My church. The ELCA. Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church in Santa Barbara, CA. Abiding Savior Lutheran Church in St. Paul, MN. Holy Trinity Lutheran Church in Livonia, MI. Lord of Life Student Congregation at California Lutheran University. El Camino Pines. St. Mark’s. Christ. Grace. Luther Glen. University. PLTS. Davis. Incarnation. LSTC. Wicker Park. Augustana. So many different names, one ELCA. This doesn’t even cover the number of congregations I’ve worshipped and communed with, worked for, visited, or eaten with.

I am part of the #decolonizelutheranism movement. And why? I am a cradle Norwegian Lutheran. I fit into the Lutheran culture, right? Why challenge it? Because I’m also Mexican. And British Isles. And west coast. And trans. And 90’s alternative. And I’m tired of needing to only embody the ¼ of my heritage that is Norwegian Lutheran in order to fit in. I’m tired of the hegemonic white church culture.

I want to come at this from the perspective of gender and sexuality, because that is the part of my experience with the ELCA that is sorely disconnected from the gospel. Gender roles, gender norms, genderpresentation, sexual expression, relational norms. It is very difficult for me to tease these things apart in my journey, my pain, my confusion, my faith life, my ministry career, my need to fit in, my need for success. I could (and plan to) write many many pages on all of these things and how I have experienced them in the ELCA. For today, I want to focus on one:

Gender presentation.

I have always had panic attacks getting ready for church. From when I was a kid, to a youth minister, to a camp director, to a seminary student. It has been shamed into me that I must look nice for church, which explicitly means that the way I dress day to day does not look nice. I have been told in more than one church that jeans are not appropriate attire. I have been told I should wear skirts more often. That the skirt I was wearing is inappropriate. When I decided I did not want to wear bras anymore because of beauty standard issues in our society, I knew I would not be able to go braless at church. Inappropriate. Another panic attack. I have been told in more than one ministry setting that I cannot have an eyebrow piercing because I am a role model to youth and other young peers. I have been told that what we wear to church is a uniform. And no, this pastor was not talking about albs and other worship garments. He was referring to the way we must dress to present ourselves appropriately to God and each other.

Panic attack. My heart is racing and my stomach is churning by typing and reliving these moments.

I have realized in the past few years that part of what I have always experienced in this clothing anxiety is gender dysphoria. I have been experiencing major distress in having to present myself a certain way. Having to “dress up” in our society is a very gendered experience. You can shop from the women’s section or the men’s section. I could dress up feminine or butch. Those were always my only two options. To look like a woman, or to look like a lesbian. Neither of which were labels that made me comfortable at all, because they do not fit who I am. Add to that the anxiety that I was being misogynistic by not wanting to look like a woman, or be perceived as a woman who loves other women. I receive my biggest support from women and from lesbian-identifying women in particular. However, the limited gender categories and limited gender presentations that fuel perceptions in society put me into a dizzying spiral on a daily basis.

More distress. More panic attacks.

But what does this have to do with the church? You may be thinking, “Raye, it sounds like your brain is just giving you anxiety, not the ELCA.” And that’s partly true – I have an anxiety disorder, but I believe it has been impressed into me through repeated encounters of shame. Shame that even though I am freed from dysphoric distress by wearing jeans and a t-shirt, I am not worthy to sit in a pew, read from the lectern, or lead singing in that outfit. Regardless of how clean, modest, attractive, and comfortable an outfit I put together, it could still be deemed unacceptable by laity and clergy at any given moment.

So instead, I put my energy toward fitting in. Toward dressing like a respectable white woman ministry leader, by the collective ELCA’s standards. These are not standards written down in any place, but rules enforced through shame. A hegemonic cultural standard, in which the ruling ethnic group determines cultural norms through unspoken means. In our country and church, this is white Western, upper-middle class, mid-20^th century Americana kinds of standards.

The big issue here is: when I dressed and acted according to these standards, I was successful as a professional ministry leader in the ELCA. I received jobs, was promoted, was invited onto planning committees, was introduced to synod and Churchwide leaders, received access to higher education. If I could look the part, speak the part, and live the part, I got the role. The problem is so much of it was an act. A forced act of survival. On one hand, financial survival. It was an act I needed to play in order to receive a salary, afford rent and food. On the other hand, it was spiritual survival. I did what I had to do in order to be allowed not only to worship in a pew, but to live out my calling to serve and lead the church. Every moment that I have the courage to drop the act and be myself, I risk both my livelihood and my belonging in my faith home.

This is why I am part of #decolonizelutheranism. Because, as much anxiety and distress and depression and suicidal thoughts it gives me, I have the white privilege to play the part and be a successful leader in the ELCA. But not everyone has my light skin, my neurotic need to fit in, my ability to “pass” as a respectable Lutheran. Others, by virtue of appearance, family heritage, language, sexuality, gender expression, vibrant personality, or cultural expressions of worship, do not “pass” as Lutherans and are always “othered.”

I refuse to be a part of the hegemony anymore. It is not worth my mental and emotional health. I should not have to hide who I am in order to be a member or leader in the ELCA. There are so many of us that have heard the gospel through the Lutheran lens: that the grace of God has overcome all barriers of sin and evil and has saved us from oppression. We are no longer slaves, but free. We no longer hate and restrict, but love and welcome. I love the ELCA, our joy-filled worship, our full reliance on the grace of God in Jesus Christ, our trust in the Holy Spirit to make us one through the sacraments of baptism and communion. These gifts are for all the people of God. This is what the #decolonizelutheranism movement is all about.

Bishop Eaton herself has raised up again and again the need for us to acknowledge the limitations of our church, especially in terms of race and racism.  When asked about the #decolonizelutheranism movement at the Sierra Pacific Synod Assembly this weekend, Bishop Eaton acknowledged that our movement is addressing importantissues of cultural exclusion (minutes 23:00-27:00 among others). I appreciate her words and her support on these issues.

However, Bishop Eaton couched us as a group of younger, newer pastors and seminarians. I suppose that in the ELCA, these words sort of apply, given the age demographics of many of our congregations. But on the other hand, I have had 32 years of experience in this church as an active member and ministry leader. While some of us may be “newer” pastors, we are not new to this church.

Bishop Eaton also characterized us as being impatient, which is true. But, Bishop, impatience is NOT a charism of the young. It is a charism of the oppressed, the pained, the bleeding, the dying. There are some of us that need change NOW. Not because we are young and idealistic. But because we and others are being cut off from ourselves in our faith home. Our churches – where we hear the good news that God loves us unconditionally, passionately, overwhelmingly, just the way we are – simultaneously are the places where we are silenced, reduced, and controlled by one group’s cultural standards. This affects us painfully. This is not a surface issue. This is a heart and soul and salvation issue. Can we fully be ourselves, our gender non-conforming, culturally non-conforming, sexually non-conforming, clapping and dancing in church, eating-disordered, neuro-diverse, wearing non-Western-elite clothing, messy, loving, broken, whole selves? We want the ELCA to celebrate that our full selves are saved by the grace of God – not to be changed through conformity but to be transformed through acceptance and belonging.

Decolonize the hegemony. #decolonizelutheranism.

Raye @irenraye 
queerly Lutheran theologian - PhD @LSTChicago - queering your visions and expectations with holy indecency - derby grrrl aka Death Raye

Churches should update their websites for summer time changes unless...

... you're a doofus like me who seems to delight in committing many a social faux-pas. I would normally recommend that a church change their website to reflect a change in worship time. It's usually how visitors find out when worship starts. Only once did a church not updating their website for summer hours work in my favor.

----

One of my preferred modes of transportation is using my own two feet. I usually have no qualms about walking unless I'm in certain areas of San Francisco or parts of the Echo Park neighborhood of Los Angeles (situations that usually require a form of jet-pack transport). I was visiting my childhood friend in Denver for a week in August and decided to visit a nearby church for Sunday worship. I did what any visitor with the Internets would do; I Googled the nearest ELCA church and found that it was within a walking distance of my friend's house. I then went to that church's website to check on worship times. The website listed two services: I cannot recall the exact times, but it was something like 8:30AM and 10AM. I decided on the latter service so I could sleep in a bit. The church was only a little over a half mile away, so I didn't feel compelled to ask to borrow my friend's car. It would be an easy stroll on a flat and level surface.

Because I was in Colorado in August, the weather was dry and warm. I decided to wear a cute skirt and matching top. I looked at the Google Maps app on my phone and saw that the church was only a short walk, five blocks north on Emerson Street. I left my friend's house early, just in case I got lost in my wanderings. As I was walking north on Emerson, a couple of cars honked as I walked by on a quiet Sunday morning. I thought the honking was odd, but I didn't really stop to think about why they were honking. Maybe they were cut off by another car behind me? Maybe something fell in the road? It really didn't matter to me because I was enjoying the stroll and the start to a gorgeous summer's day.

The church on Emerson Street.

I arrived at the church to discover that worship was already taking place... which left me, the complete Type-A perfectionist planner, completely confused. I stood in the narthex checking my watch and checking my iPhone, desperately wanting to affirm that I had everything right. I must have looked incredibly distressed, because someone came to the back of the church and handed me a bulletin. With an urgent and hushed whisper, I asked, "When did service start? I thought it started at 10?" They responded, "Because it's summer, we're only doing one worship service. It actually started at 9."

My poor Type-A brain went into overdrive with its internal monologue: WHAT.DO.YOU.MEAN.WORSHIP.STARTED.AT.NINE.AM?!!??
WHY.DIDNT.ANYONE.UPDATE.THE.FREAKING.WEBSITE!?!?!?!?

Because this was all an internal monologue, I politely smiled as I took my bulletin from the nice person and then entered the sanctuary. Maybe I heard the nice person gasp; maybe I didn't. Because the rhythms of worship were similar to my home church, I realized that the service was nearing the meal. The Offertory was taking place as I saw the offering plates moving down the pews.

I eased myself into the back pew up against the wall. I put down my purse and bulletin. As I smoothed my skirt when I was getting ready to sit down, I noticed something odd. Very odd. Very, very odd.

As I attempted to smooth my skirt as I prepared to sit down, I realized that my skirt wasn't actually there. This made me very, very, very confused. I looked down to see that yes, my skirt was actually there in the front, I did put it on in the morning before heading out the door. My mind went into a panic... I see the skirt, but WHAT IS GOING ON? Did the back part of my skirt disappear? Was it raptured? Because it if was raptured, I was going to be seriously upset. I felt pretty sure that all of the folks sitting in the sanctuary that morning would be pretty upset as well if the rapture did indeed take place. But they weren't freaking out; no one seemed to have suddenly disappeared from their midst; no one was in a panic madly searching for their loved one (or any item of clothing, for that matter). As the panic within me grew, my heart raced incessantly as I tried to figure out in my confused brain, ''WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THE BACK OF MY SKIRT???"

If I had taken the time to calmly investigate, I would have found the solution much sooner. After what seemed to be an eternity of panic half-standing, half-squatting in the back pew trying desperately to figure out this complete mystery of what happened to the back part of my skirt, I discovered that I had caused my own wardrobe malfunction. This wardrobe malfunction traveled with me as I strolled north on Emerson Street, entered the church, walked through the narthex and into the sanctuary.

It all seemed to compute at that very moment.
The couple of cars that honked their horns as I walked north on Emerson Street.
That gasp that I may (or may not) have heard as I entered the sanctuary.

The discovery? The hem of my skirt was caught in the waistband of my underwear. It seems that I flashed a good bit to drivers heading north on Emerson Street. Not to mention the nice person who greeted me in the church's narthex. I tried not to flash even more people as I tried stealthily to find where exactly the hem was caught in the waistband of my underwear. Thank God I decided to sit in the pew at the back of the church. Thank God there were no other people in the very back pew that morning.

Thank God I discovered this before walking up the center aisle to the altar for communion.

So yes, normally, I am a proponent of keeping your church website up-do-date, especially if there is a change in worship times during the summer months. But in this one time, thank goodness it worked out in my favor. Sort of.

The hour is a mystery

As I was bounding down the stairs in my in-laws' house thinking that I was late to meet with their pastor, their grandfather clock chimed five times. Those five chimes indicated that it was the hour of five; I checked my watch, which told me that local time in St. Louis was actually 8:45AM. I still had 15 minutes to make it to the church to meet with the pastor. The grandfather clock could tell me the quarter hour, but not the actual time itself.

The concept of time hadn't really registered over the past few days. Much of the days have been more task-oriented as opposed to time-oriented. The concept of time has focused on arrivals and completions. Time has been doled out in increments to orient ourselves to and for particular actions.

Making sure my father-in-law is comfortable.

Making sure that medications are given in a timely manner.

Making sure that the appropriate number of hours have passed with the arrival of the home health care aids, who have been absolute gifts from God.

Making sure that my mother-in-law makes it to her health appointments.

But in the day-to-day, many in my in-laws' house found themselves restless. My sister-in-law and her husband would find themselves awake at ridiculously early hours. I would find that I couldn't go to sleep even though my body was trying to tell my brain that it was exhausted, but yet there was time and energy enough to write. My mother-in-law would awake with the arrival of the home health care aid who would arrive in the extremely early morning hours.

The five chimes of the grandfather clock that morning told me that time was a relative concept. It was able to chime on every quarter hour; anyone in the house could tell time in fifteen minute increments if they heard the clock. Only the hour remained a mystery.

Time has made less and less sense. I feel like I have been catapulted into the previous year, being told that my father's cancer has invaded that tender space of the abdomen, the space where the body takes in and processes nourishment. But I thought, my father already died from this, why are you telling me again? I had to look at my watch and realize that it is indeed 2016 and not 2015. I had to realize that the diagnosis was not just tied to my father, but now also my father-in-law. I have to look in the hospital bed and realize that it's not my father, but my spouse's father.

Time doesn't really make sense; not only the hour, but even the year seem a mystery to me. It's as if someone hit a "rewind" button on the tape player of my life, and somehow, it has rewound itself to the previous year but in an alternate universe. Getting ready for a synod assembly not immediately close to home. Anxious with anticipation about the news contained in the next phone call. Not knowing if there is enough time to make arrangements for a last-minute flight to a destination that is not just a couple of thousand miles away, but that seems to be of another space, another point in history.

The concept of time contained and ordered... Not like real life.

There was usually one amazing marker of time, an achievement to be unlocked: the arrival of the next day. No one in my in-laws' house may have been aware of the actual date or the day of the week, but everyone was aware when a new day arrived. Everyone was somehow aware of that new day when we would wake up, tentatively look down and delicately tip-toe down the stairs into the living room, and to see my father-in-law looking back at us, breathing, comfortable, and alive.

The hour continues to remain a mystery.

Tweeting Dichotomy and Risk

Last night, I participated in the Twitter conversation (#ELCAWebcast) tied to the third ELCA webcast concerning racism within the denomination. I noticed something interesting concerning a couple of tweets.

I sent out a thought in two tweets.

The first tweet was: “What I wonder is what are we really willing to risk being a "welcoming" church?”

1/2 What I wonder is what are we really willing to risk being a "welcoming" church? #ELCAwebcast #decolonizeLutheranism

— Tuhina Verma Rasche (@tvrasche) May 26, 2016

The second tweet was: “because [sp] Christians all over the world are risking life & limb to praise Christ.”

2/2 becuase Christians all over the world are risking life & limb to praise Christ #ELCAwebcast #decolonizeLutheranism

— Tuhina Verma Rasche (@tvrasche) May 26, 2016

I noticed an interesting dichotomy taking place between these two tweets. The first shows that I can spell; the second shows that I cannot. But there were other things to notice... Maybe because with an electronic conversation in two parts, some are more apt to remember and see the first part of the conversation? Maybe I am making something out of nothing? Maybe I’m asking this particular series of questions because I myself cannot speak truth?

About the dichotomy between the tweets... The first tweet is a question. I’ve discovered that when tweeting a question to the Internet ether, it doesn’t necessitate a response. Maybe it’s a question that is merely “food for thought” on which to gnaw? Maybe it’s a question that no one wants to answer. It’s also a question, that at least in a general group discussion in the Internet, no one has to answer.

The second tweet is a statement. People around the world are not only risking their lives and limbs to raise their hands in worship to praise Christ, but they are dying.  They are risking the ultimate risk, putting their lives on the line, nailing their lives to the cross.

After a webcast, I find it frustrating that this is the level of risk offered. Some can tweet, "Great conversation!" I really have a hard time accepting that some felt that they had a difficult discussion on racism, good job, bravo! now back to our regularly scheduled programming is risk enough. When it comes to conversations about racism and identity, I don't get to change the channel. I don't get to turn off the television. If we are going to have honest conversations and take action about the racial makeup of our denomination (however awesome or flawed that may be), much more risk-taking needs to take place. 

I’ve been thinking about “welcoming,” intersectionality, and risk for awhile and in conversation with trusted friends and conversation partners. One of those beloved sisters is Alisha Gordon, who asked me, “What are you willing to give up for the liberty of all people?”

Damn. Damndamndamndamndamn. Nothing quite like a question that gets me to think... as a follower of the crucified and resurrected Christ, what would I myself be willing to risk?

Let me be entirely honest and transparent with you: I am struggling to answer that question. I am willing to risk things that personally, I deem to be big... but globally, people are risking far, far, far more.

But as a follower of Christ in the United States, do I really and truly understand the concept of risk? Do I really and truly understand what our forebearers of the faith in those early days risked to profess a crucified and risen God? In thinking about last night’s Twitter conversation and accompanying webcast, I think what I really want to ask is: what are members of the ELCA willing to risk to truly be a welcoming church? Maybe a greater yearning is to search for an answer...

What are you willing to risk as a follower of the crucified and risen Christ to truly be welcoming of Christ’s church? If the ELCA is to truly take heed, much risk-taking must take place. But what risks? What must we do, risk, and give up to #decolonizeLutheranism?

Feeling uncomfortable in an awkward conversation?

Having someone being mad at you and having a fractured relationship?

Your status? Your title? Your identity?

Your life?

Time seems to fold in upon itself

Time seems to fold in upon itself.

It felt like it took the work of a small army to get my father-in-law out of the hospital and back home under home hospice care. There was a very orderly and regimented schedule that occurred yesterday. Members of the family divided and conquered the list of tasks that needed to be completed.

Like getting my mother-in-law to her designated appointments.

Or receiving the hospital equipment at the house.

And coordinating with the doctors and nurses at the hospital to make sure that my father-in-law’s transport would take place in a timely manner.

Then being at the house to receive the initial delivery of prescriptions.

And timing the arrivals and departures of the nurses and home health aides.

Time has now shifted. Instead of shuttling back and forth to the hospital, we’re all now gathered at the home of my in-laws. We’re trying to find new rhythms of medication schedules, nurse and health aide rotations, prescription deliveries, visits from friends and family, generous food deliveries so we don’t have to take time to prepare meals, and waiting. We’re gathered at the house finding things to do in the meantime, because we’re simply sitting and waiting for what will come to pass. We’ve set the table well before mealtime. We’re outside trimming the hedges. I spend my time writing obsessively. We’re finding ways to fill the time, because watching and waiting is twisting and wrenching our hearts. If we stop to watch and wait, I fear our hearts may be obliterated.

--

Time seems to fold in upon itself.

I feel as if I’ve been here before. Holding vigil. Watching. Waiting. Knowing that the inevitable will arrive. I have been here before. It hasn’t even been a year since I saw my own father slip from this side of the eschaton to the next. And between those moments of moving from one side of the line to the other, I remember finding ways to fill the time. Reading books. Singing hymns. Praying fiercely.

--

Time seems to fold in upon itself.

The sacraments show me that time folds in upon itself. I was struck by this thought the day before my spouse’s father returned home from the hospital. The pastor who came to visit communed the family around the hospital bed. He then anointed my father-in-law’s forehead and proclaimed, “Child of God, you have been sealed by the Holy Spirit and marked with the cross of Christ forever.” Those words took me back to the previous week, a week of tongues of fire and the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, words I proclaimed in a sermon to the congregation I serve over two thousand miles away. Those words took me back to numerous times at a font, proclaimed at the baptism of babies and adults. Words proclaimed at death and resurrection. Words, water, and God’s promise proclaimed that tie us to Christ’s death and resurrection.

Sacraments are a way to recognize that time folds in upon itself, that they are a way of showing us God’s kairos time in the midst of the linear chaos of chronos time. The sacraments are a glimpse into God’s concept of time within our own concept of time. The sacraments give us a chance to see that God “is, was, and is to come.”  

--

Time seems to fold in upon itself.

The sacraments connect us to what is, what was, and what is to come. Baptism and communion tie us to those who have died and to those communities who are to come. The most stark example of this is the half circle communion rail; as we commune on one side of the circle, the communion of the saints commune on the other side, literally and figuratively. At one point, we too will join in this holy communion of the saints. The sacraments show us that God’s grace abounds. The sacraments are always for us, ways for us to see that God’s kairos time breaks into our chronos time. The past, present, and future collide and intertwine in a trinitarian dance.

--

Time seems to fold in upon itself.